Page 1 of 1

Captains replace dead Generals?

Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 6:27 am
by Trilogy
As I learn the game, I've been losing Generals at an alarming rate, and I notice that a dead brigadier usually spawns a generic captain to command the unit he has left behind. So far, all the replacement commanders seem to have pretty bad stats.

The bad stats I can understand, since it's obviously a stressful time, but it's the rank that bothers me. Why captain? Shouldn't a dead brigadier's command go to a colonel, and a colonel's to a major (or even another colonel)?

Re:Captains replace dead Generals?

Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 9:02 am
by Little Powell
Trilogy wrote:
As I learn the game, I've been losing Generals at an alarming rate, and I notice that a dead brigadier usually spawns a generic captain to command the unit he has left behind. So far, all the replacement commanders seem to have pretty bad stats.

The bad stats I can understand, since it's obviously a stressful time, but it's the rank that bothers me. Why captain? Shouldn't a dead brigadier's command go to a colonel, and a colonel's to a major (or even another colonel)?
Good point. You're a sucker for details aren't you. :)

I'll submit a report for this.

Re:Captains replace dead Generals?

Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 9:32 pm
by Jim
At 2nd Manassas, the Stonewall Brigade left the main battlefield commanded by a captain. He was the senior surviving officer in the entire brigade.

-Jim

Re:Captains replace dead Generals?

Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 10:13 pm
by garyknowz
I might be mistaken, but as I recall immediate command fell to the senior staff officer until the senior regimental commander could be notified---a laborious, time-consuming task in the heat of an engagement. So, I kind of like the arrangement. But I agree, a capt is a little low for even a senior staffer. A major would be more appropriate.

Re:Captains replace dead Generals?

Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 10:41 pm
by BOSTON
Hell, I can remember Lts. being the Army Commander after some of the Big Battles in TC2M.

Re:Captains replace dead Generals?

Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 10:46 pm
by Colonel Dreux
Yes, and the same happened at Gettysburg, especially since some brigades were commanded by colonels and got all shot up to pieces.

However, I tend to agree with the "complainant" a colonel or major should take over, perhaps even the historical ones.

Re:Captains replace dead Generals?

Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 7:45 pm
by Trilogy
Unexpectedly, I just played McPherson's Ridge again. This time, when Archer was lost (is he automatically lost by script?), he was replaced by a colonel.