Re: Unit Paths Comment... plus...
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 6:45 pm
So who here likes pie?
Shouldn't you have started a new thread???????????????????????????????????????
Making life simpler
http://norbsoftdev.net/phpBB3/
So who here likes pie?
Least he didn't ask about courier pie...So who here likes pie?
Shouldn't you have started a new thread???????????????????????????????????????
You go to hell! I shall have my pie and eat it too.So who here likes pie?
Shouldn't you have started a new thread???????????????????????????????????????
I like this idea of being able to override the pathing when necessary. Throw in a penalty whereas regiments involved could not fire, and would be helpless while the intermingling took place.I think that another toolbar button could be added into the game that would disable the pathing for this particular unit.
It can be designed so that if any of the units should come into contact with another unit friendly \ foe that it would automatically deactivate.
This would allow for simple maneuvers to be preformed without the AI taking over and directing the units on an roundabout course.
Considering that this can only be assigned to say a brigade or lower unit, this should not have any negative affect on the game, or the AI routines. Just as the Take-Command is only applied to said units this would work the same way.
It could also be designed to not allow any unit to travel more than one-hundred-yards.
This would pretty much solve this problem.
davinci
At the risk of being brash ... in order to avoid a smaller problem of units passing through or residing in the same space as other units in order to trump up realism, the game instead fattens gawdy unrealistic actions while doing little to mitigate the first one. Units still can stack one upon the other, as Parker can certainly attest to. Just yesterday, I saw two regiments occupy the exact same space. Day before that, a player in MP was able to stack a fence line with practically three brigades of infantry stacked up on each other. This happens routinely. Meanwhile, players have to micro-manage their regiments to get them into position because they go on wild routes.The pathing sets SOW apart from the other TC games. It's aim is to provide realism of troop behavior whereas moving in front of or through firing lines was totally unreal. Making the pathing tiles available in the Debug mode is how folks can check out and scrutinize the pathing system, and possibly provide suggestions to improve this feature.
My basic, and albeit somewhat knee-jerk, idea is to shut off the pathing until it can be better worked out. Or, if practical, designate specific objects that are considered impassible on the maps and have regiments wrap their routes around the dimensions of the object as tight to the object as possible if the path is blocked by such an object. A good example of this is how regiments go around buildings. Putting the regiments into column may not work, either, when facing an enemy regiment in line. If I want them to move forward in line, then putting them into column will make them more susceptible to casualties.Doubt if the LOS fix will help with the pathing issues introduced in this thread. Patch is ready, Norb should get the installer up any day now.
Too bad we don't have any pathing fixes, I'd like more than anyone to get this resolved. Maybe one fix to consider would be for units that must detour their straight line path due to pathing constraints, automatically form into column formation, thus narrowing their pathing field. Thoughts?
This should not be possible with the coming LOS fix. Unless the elevation permits 'shooting over'.Units still can stack one upon the other, as Parker can certainly attest to. Just yesterday, I saw two regiments occupy the exact same space. Day before that, a player in MP was able to stack a fence line with practically three brigades of infantry stacked up on each other.
I am really hoping this works. Also, I think the column idea is actually fine. It's an imperfect fix, but if it can be implemented while a more long-term solution is implemented, that would be nice.This should not be possible with the coming LOS fix. Unless the elevation permits 'shooting over'.