Questions/suggestions: the mini map and game Stats

General Question/Answer/Announcement about NSD. We are a small independent game development team and we value our community. If you ask, we'll answer.
ironsight
Reactions:
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 9:27 pm

Re:Questions/suggestions: the mini map and game Stats

Post by ironsight »

estabu half stands up
"You're a better man than I am, Gunga Din."

At least you thought about standing!
Me, i kept my butt firmly planted on the chair! :S
JC Edwards
Reactions:
Posts: 1830
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:37 am

Re:Questions/suggestions: the mini map and game Stats

Post by JC Edwards »

estabu2 wrote:
'estabu half stands up...sees JC in the corner beginning to rise...estabu sits back down'
:evil: :evil: :evil:
'The path that is not seen, nor hidden, should always be flanked'
Hancock the Superb
Reactions:
Posts: 1436
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 9:06 am

Re:Questions/suggestions: the mini map and game Stats

Post by Hancock the Superb »

I take it that we could all beat Napoleon?:blink: ;)
Hancock the Superb
ironsight
Reactions:
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 9:27 pm

Re:Questions/suggestions: the mini map and game Stats

Post by ironsight »

Only if you're 'The Duke of Wellington's' ghost and have the entire Prussian Army of ghosts at your disposal! :laugh:

But then again the ghost of Napoleon could call Ghost Busters!
:laugh: :laugh: :dry:
Last edited by ironsight on Sun Nov 09, 2008 3:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Chamberlain
Reactions:
Posts: 1163
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 6:39 pm

Re:Questions/suggestions: the mini map and game Stats

Post by Chamberlain »

Hey Moondog,

Good to see you made it over here !!!!!

:) :)

Chamberlain
-Col. Joshua Chamberlain, 20th Maine

We cannot retreat. We cannot withdraw. We are going to have to be stubborn today
louie raider
Reactions:
Posts: 322
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:38 am

Re:Questions/suggestions: the mini map and game Stats

Post by louie raider »

Jim wrote:
The minimap has actually been extracted from a period map of the battlefield area. The amount of info/icons *may* vary as a function of difficulty level. At grog for example there would be no icons at all, just the map. This is still in flux so definite answers are not available as yet.
Players (grogs and non-grogs alike) will need to keep in mind that GPS wasn't available back then... when you're measuring distance by how many steps your horse takes, things aren't going to perfectly match up everywhere.

your brigade might be on one side of a road/stream and the map sez otherwise...
this space for rent
estabu2
Reactions:
Posts: 817
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 9:36 am

Re:Questions/suggestions: the mini map and game Stats

Post by estabu2 »

Louie Raider wrote:
Jim wrote:
The minimap has actually been extracted from a period map of the battlefield area. The amount of info/icons *may* vary as a function of difficulty level. At grog for example there would be no icons at all, just the map. This is still in flux so definite answers are not available as yet.
Players (grogs and non-grogs alike) will need to keep in mind that GPS wasn't available back then... when you're measuring distance by how many steps your horse takes, things aren't going to perfectly match up everywhere.

your brigade might be on one side of a road/stream and the map sez otherwise...

What!!! I thought for sure they had GPS back then...didn't I see a picture somewhere of General Lee with a Motorola headset...
"It is strange, to have a shell come so near you...you can feel the wind."
Amish John
Reactions:
Posts: 894
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:20 am

Re:Questions/suggestions: the mini map and game Stats

Post by Amish John »

Louie Raider wrote:
your brigade might be on one side of a road/stream and the map sez otherwise...
This would be historically correct. Unless a unit is in direct sight of a commander, the exact location may not be known, only an approximate location. And that information could get out of date if a subordinate commander moves a unit that is out of sight of the superior officer and the subordinate officer doesn't send a courrier to inform his superior officer of the move. Even then it would depend on the contents of the message.

"General Howard,
General Barlow sends his compliments and begs to report he will advance his division to the vicinity of the Almshouse on the north side of town."

When is he planning to advance? Is he there already? Is the division north, south, east, west, or centered on the Almshouse complex? Is Barlow'division covering the plain north of town or is he covering the approach from York? How is he deployed?

It seems there is a balance of the quantity and quality of information that should be displayed on the map and still maintain the fog of war.
You can get farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone.
ironsight
Reactions:
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 9:27 pm

Re:Questions/suggestions: the mini map and game Stats

Post by ironsight »

This would be historically correct. Unless a unit is in direct sight of a commander, the exact location may not be known, only an approximate location. And that information could get out of date if a subordinate commander moves a unit that is out of sight of the superior officer and the subordinate officer doesn't send a courrier to inform his superior officer of the move.
Yep, with TC2M, part of the 'fog of war' are those enemy last position ?'s when viewing the map. Sometimes a ? won't show a regiment's name but its Commander's name instead. Just like hunting quail, it takes a line formation to flush em out. Sometimes they're no where near that ?. Maybe the new game could incorporate hound dogs!:laugh:
Its gonna be interesting how the new game handles all this differently or if at all.
If i had to choose only one map improvement in the new game, i'd be a full screen map.

In addition, enemy units will occassionally disappear from the battlefield in the open out of the woods albeit its rare but does happen. Still kon't know if its a bug or designed-in but since i've been playing the game on my new PC, i've noticed that a lot lot less.

Another unrelated thing i noticed playing TC2M on my new PC, is the ease at which artillery re-supplies now :). Before with my old PC, i'd have to coax artillery to re-supply sometimes having to sit the wagon on the gun's flag for a few seconds. Now they always resupply instantly and with the wagon galloping a few yards away. With so much computer processing going on during a medium to large battle, i think slower PCs might skip a frame or two and/or miss a resupply interupt now and then.
When is a bug a bug or just a 'relative' PC related pseudo bug?
Hancock the Superb
Reactions:
Posts: 1436
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 9:06 am

Re:Questions/suggestions: the mini map and game Stats

Post by Hancock the Superb »

I hope my clunker will run this game right. It normally runs most games well, but Fredricksburg...
Hancock the Superb
Post Reply