Captains replace dead Generals?

Let's talk about Gettysburg! Put your questions and comments here.
Post Reply
Trilogy
Reactions:
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:12 am

Captains replace dead Generals?

Post by Trilogy »

As I learn the game, I've been losing Generals at an alarming rate, and I notice that a dead brigadier usually spawns a generic captain to command the unit he has left behind. So far, all the replacement commanders seem to have pretty bad stats.

The bad stats I can understand, since it's obviously a stressful time, but it's the rank that bothers me. Why captain? Shouldn't a dead brigadier's command go to a colonel, and a colonel's to a major (or even another colonel)?
User avatar
Little Powell
Reactions:
Posts: 4884
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:25 am

Re:Captains replace dead Generals?

Post by Little Powell »

Trilogy wrote:
As I learn the game, I've been losing Generals at an alarming rate, and I notice that a dead brigadier usually spawns a generic captain to command the unit he has left behind. So far, all the replacement commanders seem to have pretty bad stats.

The bad stats I can understand, since it's obviously a stressful time, but it's the rank that bothers me. Why captain? Shouldn't a dead brigadier's command go to a colonel, and a colonel's to a major (or even another colonel)?
Good point. You're a sucker for details aren't you. :)

I'll submit a report for this.
Jim
Reactions:
Posts: 1082
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:53 am

Re:Captains replace dead Generals?

Post by Jim »

At 2nd Manassas, the Stonewall Brigade left the main battlefield commanded by a captain. He was the senior surviving officer in the entire brigade.

-Jim
"My God, if we've not got a cool brain and a big one too, to manage this affair, the nation is ruined forever." Unknown private, 14th Vermont, 2 July 1863
garyknowz
Reactions:
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:00 pm

Re:Captains replace dead Generals?

Post by garyknowz »

I might be mistaken, but as I recall immediate command fell to the senior staff officer until the senior regimental commander could be notified---a laborious, time-consuming task in the heat of an engagement. So, I kind of like the arrangement. But I agree, a capt is a little low for even a senior staffer. A major would be more appropriate.
Sorry. I suffer from a serious case of typosis. Don't worry, it's not contagious :)
BOSTON
Reactions:
Posts: 1034
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 6:13 pm

Re:Captains replace dead Generals?

Post by BOSTON »

Hell, I can remember Lts. being the Army Commander after some of the Big Battles in TC2M.
HOISTINGMAN4

Drafted in Boston
Colonel Dreux
Reactions:
Posts: 92
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:04 am

Re:Captains replace dead Generals?

Post by Colonel Dreux »

Yes, and the same happened at Gettysburg, especially since some brigades were commanded by colonels and got all shot up to pieces.

However, I tend to agree with the "complainant" a colonel or major should take over, perhaps even the historical ones.
Trilogy
Reactions:
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:12 am

Re:Captains replace dead Generals?

Post by Trilogy »

Unexpectedly, I just played McPherson's Ridge again. This time, when Archer was lost (is he automatically lost by script?), he was replaced by a colonel.
Post Reply