Historical flaw in the Pickett's charge scenarios?

Let's talk about Gettysburg! Put your questions and comments here.
Post Reply
garyknowz
Reactions:
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:00 pm

Historical flaw in the Pickett's charge scenarios?

Post by garyknowz »

Firstly, the First Minnesota is rated too high IMHO. Two degrees higher than most of the Iron Brigade? Okay, who on the Dev team is a Minnesotan? :P But that isn't really my gripe.

The 1st Minnesota at Gettysburg had 262 enlisted and officers at Gettysburg according to Harry Pfanz (Gettysburg: The Second Day, 414). Yet, the game gives it 330. Furthermore, by the third day, they had lost 212 (83%) of their numbers which isn't reflected in the Pickett's Charge scenarios at all. In fact, they still have the full 330. I understand the need to balance the game (which I sense was the reason for the omission), but the Minnesotans sacrificed tremendously the previous day, and I think it would add to the ambiance of the game to see at least some of this reflected in the scenarios.
Sorry. I suffer from a serious case of typosis. Don't worry, it's not contagious :)
MarkT
Reactions:
Posts: 299
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:15 am

Re: Historical flaw in the Pickett's charge scenarios?

Post by MarkT »

That is a good catch...
Although accounts vary of their strength, your numbers seem closer. I did not create the OOB for this scenario. I have not visited the 1st Min. in the game till recently :).

In Picketts charge, as you said, the 1st were pretty much used up the day before... It was not a matter of play balance, but more a lack of a previous day day scenario to bring it closer to our attention. Again, good catch.....
Mark S. Tewes
Post Reply